Website source readiness
Currents now compares each report with the official pages and technical signals behind it, then turns confirmed website gaps into evidence-backed actions.
What’s new
- Official pages checked against traveler needs
- Confirmed gaps become recommended actions
- Website evidence stays attached
- Technical checks cover access and clarity
Knowing that you are missing from an AI answer is only useful if you can trace the gap back to something your team can change.
Website Source Readiness connects the traveler questions in each Currents report to the official pages and technical signals that should support them.
Check official content against traveler needs
Currents reviews a focused sample of official pages against the traveler needs represented in the report. It checks whether the available content provides clear support, appears too thin, or is missing altogether.
That makes the resulting recommendation more specific than “create more content.” It distinguishes a content gap from a page that exists but needs clearer information.
Go from the gap to the page
Each confirmed gap can become a recommended action with the page-level evidence behind it. When an official page exists, the action can point back to that page. When it does not, the recommendation explains the page or section the website needs.
Source-backed actions stay connected to the report evidence, so a marketer can explain why the work matters before handing it to a writer or web team.
Keep website health in the same plan
Currents also checks crawler access, metadata, structured data, content clarity, and performance. It separates content coverage from technical access while keeping both in one repair plan.
The result is a clearer answer to two different questions: does the official website say enough, and can AI systems reliably reach and understand it?